|
|
The
Next Crisis : Interest Rate Derivatives (Jim Puplava
-
FinancialSense)
Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets
Global
Positions end-June 2010 ( BIS)
In
the first half of
2010, growth in amounts
outstanding was subdued or negative in all risk categories. Positions
of all
types of OTC derivatives fell by 4% to $583
trillion (10
times the world’s GDP).
Today the BIS
releases the latest statistics on positions in the global
over-the-counter
(OTC) derivatives market. These comprise the results of the second part
of the
Triennial Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and Derivatives
Market Activity
as well as the regular semiannual OTC derivatives statistics.
* Positions
in the OTC
derivatives market went up in
the three years since the last Triennial survey (+15%, or 5%
annualized) to
$583 trillion, but at a slower pace than during the previous period
from 2004
to 2007 (+ 131%, or 32% per year). Data from the semiannual survey
shows that
the modest overall increase is the result of a surge in positions until
June
2008, followed by a decline in the wake of the financial crisis. Growth
in gross market values, which provide a
measure of the counterparty risk of these positions at
prevailing market
prices, increased far more than notional amounts outstanding, going
up by 122% to $25 trillion at the end of June
2010 . This compares to a growth of 74% during the previous
(2004-07)
reporting period.
* The modest
overall growth in notional amounts outstanding hides significant
variations across risk categories. The
highest growth was recorded in the interest
rate segment of the OTC derivatives
(25%), bringing the share of this
risk category in the market total
to 82%.
Positions in foreign exchange derivatives went up by 9%. By contrast,
amounts
outstanding of the other OTC segments declined substantially, ranging
from 30%
and 40% (equity and credit) to 60% (commodity contracts). Sharp
movements in
asset prices, related to a reassessment of risks during the financial
crisis,
drove up gross market values of foreign exchange (100%), credit (88%)
and
interest rate derivatives (175%). Gross market values of equity and
commodity
contracts declined.
*
*
Data from
the semiannual survey shows that, in the first half of 2010, growth in
amounts
outstanding was subdued or negative in all risk categories. Positions
of all
types of OTC derivatives fell by 4% to $583 trillion, following the 2%
increase
in the second half of 2009. The decline occurred against the backdrop
of deteriorating
market sentiment related to the
European sovereign debt crisis. However, much of the contraction
reflected a valuation effect due to the depreciation of European
currencies
against the US dollar, the currency in which the data are reported. In
contrast
to the decline in the positions, gross market values for existing OTC
contracts
rose by 15% to $25 trillion at end-June on the back of sharp asset
price
movements. Gross
credit exposures, after
netting agreements, which had dropped slightly in the half-year
up to
end-2009 (-6%) increased
by 2% to $3.6
trillion.
* Notional
amounts outstanding of credit
default swaps (CDS) declined for the fifth
consecutive semiannual period, largely due to terminations of existing
contracts. Gross market values for single-name contracts dropped
by 16%,
while those for multi-name contracts rose by 10%. The latest semiannual
survey
introduces additional information on the importance of central
counterparties
(CCPs) in the CDS market. At end-June 2010, about 11% of CDS positions
were
vis-à-vis a CCP 1 .
The CDS
counterparty breakdown for contracts with other financial institutions
has also
been expanded. In particular, special purpose vehicles (SPVs) and hedge
funds
are singled out for the first time. CDS contracts with hedge funds and
SPVs
account for about 5% and 4% respectively of total notional amounts
outstanding
with other financial institutions.
A detailed
analysis of elements of the 2010 Triennial Survey and of the end June
2010
semiannual OTC derivatives statistics will be made available in the
forthcoming
December BIS Quarterly Review. In particular, the publication will
include special
features on structural changes in the CDS market, on derivatives in the
emerging economies, on the drivers of growth in FX markets, and a
user's guide
to the Triennial survey.
EU
unveils crackdown on derivatives FT
The rules being
proposed by the Commission will need approval both from EU member
states and
the European parliament. The aim is to have them in
force by mid to late 2012.
The proposals
follow agreement by G20 leaders last year to standardise
derivatives trading and move them on to exchanges or electronic trading
platforms where appropriate. The proposals will closely align
the EU
with the new regime that is coming into force in the US.
The rules will
require standard OTC derivatives to be processed through clearing
houses – a
move aimed
at reducing systemic risk arising
from a default of one party in an OTC deal. They will also
require OTC
contracts – the bilateral agreements between buyers and sellers – to be
reported to “trade repositories” or data banks, and for this
information to be
available to regulators.
But Brussels also
plans to make it more expensive for firms to deal in non-cleared
contracts, by
requiring them to hold more capital against these – although that
measure will
be introduced in separate legislation shortly.
The
short-selling proposals suggest that investors must disclose
significant net
short positions to regulators
once these
amount to 0.2 per cent of the issued share capital of a company, and to
the
market at a higher 0.5 per cent threshold.
So-called “naked”
short selling – where traders sell a security without owning it or
borrowing it
in expectation of buying it back at a cheaper level – will only be
allowed in
limited circumstances.
There will be a specific
regime for telling regulators about
significant net
short positions in credit
default swap positions related to EU sovereign debt issuers. The
proposals also
include powers to allow national regulators to restrict short selling
in
sovereign CDSs during periods of volatile trading
Hospitals
Claim Wall Street Wounds WSJ
Hospitals that
made wrong-way "swaps" and auction-rate bets are blaming Wall Street.
The Street says the hospitals had reaped millions of dollars in savings
before
the market turned sour. Some hospitals are
paying millions of dollars in penalties to get out of derivatives
contracts,
after betting incorrectly that interest rates would rise. Other
hospitals are
paying higher interest rates. At many, these ill-fated financial bets
have
contributed to layoffs and scuttled projects.
More
than 500 nonprofit hospitals—at least one in six—bought interest-rate
"swaps" in a bid to lower their borrowing costs, estimates Municipal Market Advisors, a
Concord,
Mass., consulting firm. The swaps allowed
hospitals to act much like homeowners switching
from a floating-rate mortgage to fixed-rate one, betting on rising
interest
rates.
For a fee, the
hospitals received a fixed rate to sell bonds, lower than the
municipal-bond
market at the time. These bets backfired when the Federal Reserve cut
interest
rates to nearly zero from more than 5% in 2007.
Hospitals also
issued auction-rate securities—which reset bond prices weekly or
monthly
through auctions—that represented about a third of the $330 billion
market for
these derivatives.
Hospitals paid
Wall Street firms more than $120 million in fees for the securities
between
2005 and 2007, said data firm Thomson Reuters. That
market dried in the 2008 financial panic, leaving hospitals with higher
interest rates. Wall Street firms
and many hospital executives say interest-rate
swaps were a plain-vanilla product that they have sold for years
and say
no one could have foreseen the crisis that cratered the auction-rate
securities
market. "For years and years it was a smart strategy," said Richard
Clarke, president of Healthcare Financial Management Association, a
trade
group. "Hospitals made money on these for a long time."
The hospital deals
were part of a
larger stampede into swaps
contracts by cities, schools and other taxing districts seeking to
lower their
payments on bonds they sold. Some strapped hospitals only now are
beginning to
break the contracts and pay a financial penalty for it.
Swaps were
"the Edsel of the time," said John Hackbarth Jr., chief financial
officer of Owensboro Medical Health System of Kentucky, which recently
paid
about $14 million to end an interest-rate swap with Merrill Lynch, now
part of
Bank of America Corp.
|
|