Big Government leads to
Serfdom an
d Poverty

      ►  English Newsletter  
        Nederlandstalige Nieuwsbrief
        French, Italian and other languages 
        Statistics portal - Data from around the Globe
        Freedom Video Library: Economics made easy
        Library - Books, Links, Free Market Institutes, Downloads

   Mission Statement
The WebThis Site


The best Social
is a Job
( Ronald Reagan )
news home news contact
francais English
On Gore-ists and Kyoto-crats: 
“Bourgeois Idealists” Advocate Green Bureaucracy
Dr. Martin De Vlieghere

On a cold winter’s day I visited a fashion conscious teacher. It was hot in her apartment. Yet she refused to lower the heat of the radiators because the tile floor in the hall still felt cold. She was in the habit of walking through the apartment barefoot in a bathrobe after her evening shower. Shortly before she had expressed to me her worries about the increase of CO2-emissions and about evil George Bush junior for not ratifying the Kyoto-protocol..

pollutor aircraftHard working Yuppies have no time to think. Whenever they get a few days off, their suitcases are packed to go on a trip, preferably by air. Their vacations are as hectic as their jobs. So even then there is no opportunity to reflect on their lifestyle. This is a vicious circle: pressed by the mass media and the advertisement industry the young professionals do not get the chance to question their cultural image of normality. They just mimic the Hollywood lifestyle.

They forget that in the Mediterranean climate of Hollywood the airy villas with two-storey living rooms are well integrated in the environment. In cold, wet countries such as Flanders in Northern Europe this is much less the case. It is a natural law that hot air rises. In the hip duplex lofts the sleeping corner gets unpleasantly hot before the sitting room gets warm. The energy consumption of Belgian families to heat and to cool their homes has never been higher. Despite rising ecological ‘awareness’ the energy consumption of families has never been higher. The ‘modern’ family wants its home to be tropically hot during winter and super cool – thanks to energy guzzling air-conditioning – during summer.

Never before did families torch so much non-renewable combustibles. Not only the frantic heating and cooling of houses, but also the travelling frenzy and the blockbuster sales of ‘Sports Utility Vehicles’ (read: Silly Ugly Vehicles) has caused family spending on energy to explode.

The green parties are opposed to raising taxes on fuel consumption

Politicians do not have the courage to tackle the squanderers. Rather than simply taxing energy consumption they create a new bureaucracy with thousands of inspectors and specialists to promote ‘ecological’ technology. The former presidential candidate Al Gore is so popular, not because he has a true ecological message, but because he so eloquently defends more bureaucracy. Countless incompetent rich kids with masters degrees revel in the prospect of getting cool jobs in organisation and planning. They pretend that the average family or company will lower its energy consumption because the government wants them to do so. The households will pretend to be energy efficient by installing loads of insulating materials while carrying on heating the staircase and walking around the fashionable ‘open’ layout of their house in short sleeves during winter.

The most obvious and simple ecological taxes are the already existing taxes on fossil fuels. The administrative cost of a drastic augmentation of these taxes is nil. In Belgium the price of heating fuel can easily be doubled. This would even be an administrative rationalisation since it would abolish the fiscal discrimination between heating oil and diesel oil (the difference between both fuels is purely a fiscal colour pigment). There would be no need anymore for fiscal agents to inspect the politically correct colour of the fuel in the fuel tank of your car.

The ‘green’ parties were the first political advocates of ecotaxes. Today they are against them. Apparently they are afraid state power will suffer from simple and efficient ecotaxes. Their official reasons are the oldest knockdown arguments against any kind of market mechanism. ‘Ecotaxes can be very antisocial. Some people will not be able to pay for more expensive fuels…’ This is what the Belgian politician Els Keytsman from the Green Party told the weekly magazine Knack shortly before the publication last month of her book on the energy policy project of her party. In this book she concedes that her Kyoto plan would cost Belgian taxpayers 3 billion euros (4 billion dollars) annually.

A politically correct intellectual will not dare to suggest that perhaps poor people too should economize on energy. The self-proclaimed ecologists prefer an interminable bureaucracy of emission quota and subsidies for ‘green’ technologies rather than to speak about the causes of rising poverty. Indeed many pensioners cannot pay the rising fuel bill. In Belgium both the legal pensions and the privately organised pension plans have progressively been eroded by the very inflation which must finance the spendthrift public sector. The Green Party wants still more government.

Keytsman: ‘The market does not work because people are not economical creatures’. Of course not. The people do not act on economic logic because they are continuously patronised by the state. In the same interview: ‘The free market is bad because the consumer is badly informed and irrational.’ Oh yeah, that is why the free market should be replaced by the super informed, super rational public authorities. The well-fed, perfectly healthy young intellectuals from the Green Party will patronize and tax the exhausted productive slaves some more.

Contrary to what Keytsman says, the homo oeconomicus is not a caricature invented by economists, but an existentialist explanation of the human condition. Man is the unhappy animal that worries all the time and therefore always tries to improve his conditions and save his children. Only an economy of growth – a horreur for the Greens – is capable of releasing the resources needed to cope with new kinds of problems, such as some environmental problems. Human beings do want to return to the animal state of carelessness from time to time, which is why narcotics and brainless entertainment are so successful, but it is the free market that awakens us from our doze and that rewards economically rational acts. The free market stimulates the homo oeconomicus in each of us; the Green Party presupposes the civil servant, and only he, somehow to be nothing but the perfect homo oeconomicus.

Belgium has to cope with high unemployment rates and rising stress in the working place. This structural mismatch on the labour market could be taken away when higher ecotaxes replace income tax. Belgium has one of the largest number of tax collectors per capita in the world. Still the tax collecting system faces collapse because of the myriad of taxes and tax-breaks.

Abolishing income tax causes the unemployment trap to disappear and slashes the fiscal bureaucracy. The remaining net loss for public finance can be compensated by raising the already existing taxes on fossil fuels and introducing a proportionally equal ecotax on kerosene. If some youngsters complain that they can no longer pay the aeroplane for a party weekend on Ibiza, ignore them. If some pensioners complain that they can no longer pay their heating bill, raise their allowance, and let them choose either to burn their money or economize on energy and do more interesting things with their money.

The Energy Performance of Buildings regulation and the Kyoto treaty are the most grotesque caricatures of what Karl Marx 165 years ago called ‘bourgeois idealism’. Look for the causes of problems not in the economic reality, but in the bad ideas of evil or dumb people. According to Marx, it was their idealism that made the utopian socialists the most dangerous traitors of the exploited class.

Today more than ever the idealists are call for more bureaucracy and conceal that this will inevitably be financed by the already hard pressed and shrinking productive part of the population. Excessive energy consumption is caused by the low price of energy, not by the lack of expertise about the energy efficiency of buildings. We do not need EPB measurements to curb our energy consumption, we already get our bills from our energy suppliers. In an enormous arch the fashionable intellectuals and ex-presidential candidates dance around the problem in order to get more bureaucracy rather than lower energy consumption.

This essay was first published in The Brussels Journal


Also read the view of Worldwatch:
Shifting Tax Burden to Polluters could Cut Taxes on Wages and Profits by 15%


Dr. Martin De Vlieghere is economist and doctor of philosophy since 1993.  His PhD was written on the conditions of modernity in the works of Habermas and Hayek. He has been assistant professor at the Department of Philosophy of the University of Ghent. He is president of the "Free Association for Civilization Studies" and member of the board of directors of Nova Civita, and fellow of the Brussels' think tank Work and Wealth for All.


"More informed respondents both feel less personally responsible for global warming,
and also show less concern for global warming"

- 2008 Texas A&M University Study

Climate of Fear (Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT)
The Case for Skepticism on Global Warming (Michael Crichton, A.B. Anthropology, M.D. Harvard)
Climate chaos? Don't believe it (Christopher Monckton, The Daily Telegraph, UK)

global warming temperature graphs

A Global Warming Primer (PDF) (National Center for Policy Analysis)
A Skeptic’s Guide to Debunking Global Warming Alarmism (PDF) (US Senate Environment & Public Works Committee)
A Skeptical Layman's Guide to Anthropogenic Global Warming (PDF) (Climate Skeptic)
Global Warming FAQ (PDF) (Competitive Enterprise Institute)
Global Warming: Science vs. Nonsense (PDF) (EIR Economics)

Fallacies about Global Warming (Science & Public Policy Institute)
Five Biggest Myths about Global Warming (The Washington Examiner)
Global Warming: Fact and Myth (S. Fred Singer, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences)
Global Warming Myths (Friends of Science)
Green Myths On Global Warming - Debunked (The Association of British Drivers, UK)
Heartland President Debunks Global Warming Myths (The Heartland Institute)
Myths and Facts About the Environment (National Center for Public Policy Research)
Myths of Global Warming (National Center for Policy Analysis)
The Global Warming Myth? (John Stossel, ABC News)
Top 10 Climate Myth-Busters for 2007 (Steve Milloy, B.A. Natural Sciences, M.S. Health Sciences)
Top 10 Environmental Myths (PDF) (U.S. Chamber of Commerce)
Top 10 'Global-Warming' Myths (Human Events)

A Climate of Belief (PDF) (Patrick Frank, Ph.D. Chemistry)
Apocalypse Cancelled (PDF) (Christopher Monckton, Former Policy Advisor for British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher)
Carbon Dioxide is not the primary cause of global warming (PDF) (Allan M.R. MacRae, B.Sc., M.Eng.)
Carbon Emissions Don’t Cause Global Warming (PDF) (David Evans, B.Sc. Physics, M.S. Statistics, Ph.D. Engineering)
Climate Change Re-examined (PDF) (Joel M. Kauffman, Ph.D. Organic Chemistry, MIT)
Climate Science: Climate Change and Its Impacts (PDF) (David R. Legates, Ph.D. Climatology)
CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our Time (PDF) (Zbigniew Jaworowski, M.D. Ph.D. D.Sc.)
Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (PDF) (Arthur Robinson, Ph.D. Chemistry)
Global Warming and Nature's Thermostat (Roy Spencer, Ph.D. Meteorology)
Global Warming - Is Carbon Dioxide Getting a Bad Rep? (PDF) (Joseph D’Aleo, M.S. Meteorology)
Is the Sky Really Falling? A Review of Recent Global Warming Scare Stories (PDF) (Patrick J. Michaels, Ph.D. Ecological Climatology)
Is There a Basis for Global Warming Alarm? (Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT)
Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate (PDF) (S. Fred Singer, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences)
Pseudoscientific elements in climate change research (PDF) (Arthur Rörsch, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Molecular Genetics)
The Acquittal of Carbon Dioxide (Jeffrey A. Glassman, Ph.D. Applied Physicist and Engineer)
The Increase in Global Temperature: What it Does and Does Not Tell Us (PDF) (Robert C. Balling Jr., Ph.D. Professor of Climatology)
The Lynching of Carbon Dioxide - The Innocent Source of Life (PDF) (Martin Hertzberg, Ph.D. Physical Chemistry)
The Myth of Dangerous Human Caused Climate Change (PDF) (Robert (Bob) M. Carter, B.Sc. Geology, Ph.D. Paleontology)
The IPCC's dubious evidence for a human influence on climate (PDF) (John McLean, Climate Data Analyst)
The Science Isn't Settled - The Limitations of Global Climate Models (PDF) (Timothy (Tim) F. Ball, Ph.D. Historical Climatologist)

Independent Summary for Policymakers: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (PDF) (The Fraser Institute)
Civil Society Report on Climate Change (PDF) (Civil Society Coalition on Climate Change)

Please also visit our     with free downmoads of :
Masterpieces of  Economics and Philosophy   ( Free Downloads )
With acknowledgements to the Foundation for Economic Education )

The Road to Serfdom. This masterpiece of Nobel Prize laureate Friedrich Hayek is an eye-opener, strongly advocating the free market principles. In this all-time classic Hayek persuasively warns against the authoritarian utopias of central planning and the welfare state. Fascism, communism and socialism share these utopias. For the implementation of their plans these authoritarian ideologies require government power over the individual, inevitably leading to a totalitarian state. Every step away from the free market toward planning reduces people's freedom and is a step toward tyranny. Planning also cannot assess consumer preferences with sufficient accuracy to efficiently co-ordinate production. However in a free market, "Price" is the all-inclusive source of information, guiding entrepreneurs to produce whatever is wanted and directing workers wherever they are most needed. Free markets also provide the entrepreneurial climate for a thriving economy and for releasing the creative energy of its citizens. Free individuals in their native strive to develop their talents and to improve their fate produce spontaneous progress. All public interference in the economic process disturbs the market equilibrium, distorts the optimal allocation of resources and consequently reduces the level of wealth. Where planning replaces free markets people do not only loose their freedom and individuality. Resulting slow growth also increases welfare demands causing dependence similar to slavery. In the end people's self-reliance and self-respect is ruined, and citizens are degraded to a means to serve the ends of the collective mass.
  Free condensed pdf
   Dutch Abstract
Paperback Version
Readers' Digest

More Books of
Friedrich Hayek here
The Tragedy of the commons  by  Garrett Hardin   Free access and unrestricted demand for a finite resource ultimately dooms the resource through over-exploitation. This occurs because the benefits of exploitation accrue to individuals, each of which is motivated to maximise his or her own use of the resource, while the costs of exploitation are distributed between all those to whom the resource is available (which may be a wider class of individuals than those who are exploiting it). The theory itself is as old as Aristotle who said: "That which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it.      more here
...  many more free downloads in our    

Do You feel more people should read this?          Please link this page or mail it to a friend